As Meghan and Harry join Instagram what is the Sussexes social media

A series of pictures – or a carousel,… Never before has an Instagram caption been so loaded. On Tuesday afternoon, the Kensington Palace account posted this seemingly innocuous announcement: “Welcome to Instagram, @SussexRoyal! Follow @SussexRoyal for more on the work of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Follow @KensingtonRoyal for more on the work of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.” And lo, the division of the households of Sussex and Cambridge was complete. We knew they would no longer share a team of advisers, aides and press officers. But a split of their Instagram accounts sealed the deal. @SussexRoyal entered the social media stratosphere with a post which was, frankly, peak Harry and Meghan. 

St Vincent man found guilty of raping his wife

Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)RelatedFormer media worker gets 25 years jail – jury finds him guilty of raping 13-year-old girlFebruary 25, 2016In “Crime”Man accused of raping child found not guilty by juryJanuary 15, 2019In “Court”Caretaker gets 18 years for raping girl, 15November 28, 2018In “Court” KINGSTOWN, St Vincent (CMC) — A 39-year-old man, who was found guilty of raping his wife four years ago, has been sentenced to 13 years in jail.An eight-member jury had, in November, also found the man guilty of assaulting his wife between October 15 and 18, 2014, occasioning actual bodily harm.The man’s identity is being withheld and the jury had also returned a guilty verdict that on December 13, 2014, he abducted his wife and assaulted her.However, the jury was split evenly on a second charge of rape, allegedly committed between October 15 and 18, 2014.There was also a hung jury on a charge of aggravated burglary and damage to property, crimes the man was accused of committing on December 13, 2014.Acting Director of Public Prosecutions, Sejilla McDowall had asked the court for an adjournment for the Crown to decide on a course of action regarding the charges on which the jury did not reach an agreement.During the trial, the court heard that the couple was having marital problems and that there was no communication between them while the wife was in England for three months caring for an ill sibling.The jury accepted the prosecution’s case that the man had raped his wife on October 13 after he forced himself into an apartment where the woman was living with their son.The court heard that the man had wielded a penknife during an argument with his wife and during the fracas demanded whether or not she had been faithful to him.The court heard that the man had sex with the woman against her will.But defence counsel, Ronald “Ronnie” Marks argued that the couple had engaged in “make-up sex”. read more